"Wildly Weird" RNA is Transmitting Information Inside Our Bodies

We see balance around us, in nature and in all living things. What these maniacal scientists are doing is upsetting that balance in ever more dangerous ways.

One-time or recurring donations can be made at Ko-Fi

You can listen to me read this article here:

The microbes in the human gut and elsewhere harbor puzzling circles of RNA whose functions are a mystery. ARTUR PLAWGO/SCIENCE SOURCE

Yesterday, I came across something that is so interesting, I just had to share it.

In my recent essay, The New Self-Amplifying RNA Vaccines Promise to be Double, Triple, Quadruple the Fun! I wrote about how mRNA and now saRNA (self-amplifying) “vaccines” are part of a global experiment to discover the best ways to send messages through human bodies, instructing those bodies to perform in whatever way they are ordered to do.

That’s why I was quite interested to come across this article announcing the “discovery” of a new obelisk ‘lifeform’ that is hiding inside humans. Whatever it is, it’s very good at transmitting messages through our bodies, just like the experts want to find out how to do for themselves.

Scientists say they aren’t sure what these obelisks are or what they do (scientists sure say that a lot about a lot of things). They might not even be a lifeform. On the other hand, they might redefine what a lifeform is.

Anyway, it’s all very exciting.

These obelisks are tiny bits of “wildly weird” RNA — even smaller than viruses — that colonize the bacteria inside human guts and mouths.

“It’s insane,” says Mark Peifer, a cell and developmental biologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC). “The more we look, the more crazy things we see.”

Hold on, why does UNC sound familiar? Oh yeah, in my essay, “We're making diseases more dangerous and they're escaping from labs”, UNC and the Wuhan Institute of Virology teamed up to create a modified corona virus that was shown to be able to latch on to human cells and replicate in lung cells, efficiently enough to cause a pandemic.

Nice!

Not only that, but the UNC lab has been rife with accidents. From Jan. 1, 2015, through June 1, 2020, the university reported 28 lab incidents involving genetically engineered organisms to safety officials at the NIH. In 2020 ProPublica reported on six accidents with Lab-Created Coronaviruses, where mice escaped from containers, bit staff, and contaminated bedding fell to the floor.

Don’t worry, though, UNC is so dedicated to our health and safety, they’re not going to stop investigating and the government and Big Pharma aren’t going to stop funding them. That’s why they’re so excited about these obelisks inhabiting what they call our “virome”, defined as the total collection of viruses in and on the human body.

What we know about “Novel Circular (obelisk) RNA Genomes”:

As they collect and analyze massive amounts of genetic sequences from plants, animals, and microbes, biologists keep encountering surprises, including some that may challenge the very definition of life. The latest, reported this week in a preprint, is a new kind of virus like entity that inhabits bacteria dwelling in the human mouth and gut….

It’s not yet known whether obelisks affect human health, says Matthew Sullivan, an integrative biologist at Ohio State University, but they could alter the genetic activity of their bacterial hosts, which in turn could affect human genes….

So far, they’ve discovered at least 30,000 distinct types of these obelisks. They want to know if they are “friend or foe”, but is that the right question?

Our bodies are a universe of living entities, for lack of a better term. Scientists tell us our microbiome is inhabited by at least 38 trillion bacteria. If you think that’s a lot, our “virome” consists of 380 trillion viruses. I’m not sure how they came up with that magic number but it’s impressive.

I know plenty of people will say, “Hold on, I can’t read this garbage, viruses don’t exist!”

So, make up another name, I don’t care. The fact is sometimes we get sick and sometimes we don’t and usually, thank goodness, we get better. Something is making all of that happen.

I might not be a doctor, or a scientist but I know instinctively that we need to keep the insides of our bodies balanced. The yin and the yang, the light and the dark, the good and the bad. We see balance around us, in nature and in all living things. What these maniacal scientists are doing is upsetting that balance in ever more dangerous ways.

Even scientists admit that harming our bacteria can be harmful to our health. Like when we take antibiotics, the good bacteria are killed along with the bad. Scientists also believe that viruses could be keeping us healthy since all they live for is to “kill bacteria” and that’s something they know how to do, and we don’t.

But we do know, instinctively, that the best way to maintain optimal health is through eating natural foods, that are grown organically and locally on small farms. We know that exercising regularly and relaxing with family and friends is good for our health.

Imagine if, during the next Superbowl, Pfizer put out an ad advocating living a naturally healthy life. I have a good imagination, but I can’t imagine that—it wouldn’t earn them billions of dollars. Not only that, but they would lose the billions of addicts they are cultivating and the control they have over their bodies.

Instead, they claim they are going to “outdo cancer”. The song that goes with this ludicrous promise is sung by Freddy Mercury who died of AIDS—a disease no doubt created thanks to the pharmaceutical industry.

On top of that, it’s an advert for their new cancer drugs.

In my essay Get Ready for Pfizer's "TURBO-CHARGED GUIDED MISSILE" Cancer Drugs, I quote Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla gleefully announcing that "1 in 3 people in the world are going to have cancer."

2 million plus new cancer cases are projected for 2024 in the U. S. alone.

What a huge market for Pfizer’s drugs! Investors must be happy. Pfizer promises that:

Nothing is more urgent, or more personal, than our goal to outpace, outsmart, and outmaneuver cancer at every turn.

At the top of the list of their “outsmarting” cancer plan is a slew of RNA therapies:

Given the evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of clinically approved mRNA vaccines, coupled with growing interest in mRNA-based therapeutics, mRNA technology is poised to become one of the major pillars in cancer drug development.

Yes, those mRNA vaccines for Covid were a success and nothing’s going to stop more gene therapies messing with the human population.

It doesn’t matter that despite the billions upon billions already invested in fighting diseases all they have to show for it are more diseases.

1. Chronic Diseases: Chronic diseases are a significant cause of death worldwide. In 2019, ischemic heart disease alone accounted for approximately 8.89 million deaths, and all cardiovascular diseases combined caused around 17.9 million deaths annually¹.

2. Communicable Diseases: These include infectious diseases. In 2019, there were approximately 1.2 million deaths from tuberculosis, and 58,371 new cases of salmonella were reported. Additionally, 34,945 new cases of Lyme disease and 371 new cases of meningococcal disease were recorded².

3. HIV Infections: In the United States, an estimated 1 million people are infected with HIV, and approximately 40,000 new infections occur each year.

Need I go on? They keep telling us what a success they are, but the facts don’t support their delusional claims.

The goal is exploitation not eradication. These “experts” are in a race to find the next “wonder drug” to sell to an ever more drug addled public. They are betting on finding those “viruses in our viromes that have already figured out how to protect us from the bad guys, while leaving the good bacteria intact.”

They can’t stand it that our bodies already instruct us what to do to protect against the bad guys. The “experts” want to take over that job and instruct our bodies.

They want to utilize phages to treat life-threatening infections from bacteria resistant to most, if not all, available antibiotics. This is called phage therapy. Phage is short for bacteriophage and is a virus that infects and replicates within bacteria and archaea.

Of course, there's a big problem. There always is:

Unfortunately, these treatments are and will continue to be hampered by inadequate information on how phages behave in the human body and the unforeseen consequences their introduction may have on the human host.

But make no mistake about it; the viruses that have evolved with us for so many years are not only part of our past but will play a significant role in the future of human health.

Remember when they said they would get rid of Covid? Now, apparently, viruses aren’t going anywhere. They are just going to figure out how to exploit them.

There is a competition now between RNA and DNA editing to see which one will be more successful in the end.

RNA editing versus DNA editing:

DNA editing and RNA editing share the same end goal, in that they both want to alter a protein’s structure or quantity. However, unlike DNA editing, RNA editing allows scientists to make changes in the molecules that carry the instructions needed to produce proteins, without actually changing the original DNA code.

However, …RNA editing does also have its disadvantages when compared to DNA editing. For example, … DNA editors need to act only on the two chromosomes in each cell. “That gives us the advantage of possibly lower dosing and more effective drug targeting. With RNA editing, you’ve got a lot more targets to take care of.”

Furthermore, …if you want this RNA editor to be effective for the patient, it’s going to be hanging around and being active. And if it has a wrong activity going along with that, you’re in the same situation.

Why does that sound so familiar? Oh yeah, I just wrote the same kinds of sentences in The New Self-Amplifying RNA Vaccines Promise to be Double, Triple, Quadruple the Fun!, comparing saRNA vaccines to mRNA vaccines:

Yes, the dose [in saRNA vaccines] is smaller. However, once inside the body, it keeps copying itself and sticks around longer. The claim is that since less RNA is injected it will make for less side effects. But it’s the spike protein that causes the problems. With saRNA vaccines more spike proteins will be encoded, and they stick around longer. Doesn’t that mean it will cause more side effects, not less. But what do I know?

Once again, they sell a product that promises to be “new and improved”, and “bigger and better”—just like a Big Mac or your favorite cereal—but it still causes the same old problems. Maybe even worse.

That won’t stop them from experimenting on people who are desperate to get better.

Wave Life Sciences Announces Initiation of Dosing in RestorAATion Clinical Program Evaluating First-Ever RNA Editing Candidate

This type of genetic therapy can reduce, increase or modify RNA, including silencing, splicing, editing.

Wave earned $20 million from GSK for the initiation of dosing and is eligible for additional development, launch, and sales-related milestones of up to $505 million for their therapy, WVE-006

How is it possible that these companies are still in business after the harm they have caused?

Smith, Kline & Co. lab staff outside the Cherry Street, Philadelphia building, 1880s

In 2012 GSK had the distinction of settling the largest health care fraud case in U. S. history.

GSK agreed to pay $3 billion to resolve its criminal and civil liability arising from the company’s unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices, the Justice Department announced today.

Despite the fact that GSK still faces a lengthy list of cases, including lawsuits claiming Zantac causes cancer, it now has 71 vaccines and specialty medicines in its drug development pipeline.

Tell me why I should trust such criminals with injecting editing messages into my body? One reason, just give me one.

GSK is collaborating with Wave to advance “a pipeline of wholly owned RNA editing therapeutics designed to either correct or upregulate mRNA across a range of high impact targets. The company’s discovery and development efforts in RNA editing are powered by its proprietary “edit-verse”, which leverages genetic datasets and deep learning models to identify new RNA editing targets and edit sites. These targets leverage easily accessible biomarkers, offer efficient paths to proof-of-concept in humans, and represent meaningful commercial opportunities.

Nice.

In 2020, GSK bought a 10% stake in German biotech company CureVac for 130 million pounds ($163.67 million).

Curvac is the company that claims it’s “revolutionizing RNA for life.

Both GSK and CureVac are backed by Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates and will work on developing up to five so-called mRNA-based vaccines and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for infectious diseases.

Imagine, messages being sent through our bodies by corrupt companies that have proven over and over that they will lie, cheat and experiment on any and all of us with impunity.

We are told that these newly found obelisks are “novel”. Just like coronavirus was “novel”.

The experts are baffled. They don’t know the history of these obelisks or their relation to viruses—at least that’s what they say. They don’t know whether “viruses evolved from increasingly complex viroids and obelisks or emerged first and then degenerated into these simpler structures”. They admit that these diverse RNAs have gone unnoticed while they “colonized the inside of humans and global microbiomes.”

Colonized since when?

A million years ago?

A hundred years ago?

How about three years ago?

With all this editing and slicing, how do we know the “experts” aren’t knowingly or unknowingly creating a whole slew of “wildly weird” RNA that might well start sending rogue, senseless messages throughout our bodies.

We don’t know.

And neither do they.