We believed the Dalai Lama's seductive lie that "anything goes" in the pursuit of happiness; that "The Purpose of Life is to Be Happy", even if it means abusing children.
Wow--so well said once again, Karen. I've been reading several of those articles & watching some of those videos in the last few days, & the mamma bear in me was getting very angry! What are they doing to our kids?!?! Thank you for speaking TRUTH in a world full of perversions & lies--unashamedly!!
There's a video of Putin kissing a little boy's stomach in front of an admiring crowd. George W. Bush kissed children in an icky way. That's elite culture.
"The purpose of life is to be happy" is a lot like the iconic Aleister Crowley saying "Do what thy wilt is the whole of the law". They are in effect the same thing. It means everything is about you and nothing else matters.
All these pieces of s***t mentaly deranged and pedophiles creatures, ( I can't call them humans), are organized very well in a web of famous clubs, organizations, forums etc, dalai lama is of club of rome. They never have been and never will be punished, they take care and cover each other better than we take care of all children. Such a sick world...
2 yrs ago when I saw that David Martin included the "Dolly Llama" on the shortlist of globalists ta watch our for my eyes got big! I KNEW that there was somethin' kinda scam-ish about his celebrity tours... I knew the old connections in general to MI6/Tavistock... datin' back to the 1960s, an' about all that Hollyweird fete'in' an' all them fundraisers by the Thurmans (Uma & her daddy) an' all the fancy buildin's in New Yawk fer these folks... (I wondered even back then if Richard Gere's devotion was sincere an' he wuz just hornswoggled...or if he knew stuff... I thought the former as he seems to have stepped away from the dark side o' hollyweird...) So all that was already on my radar, but I did not think of Hello Dolly as a WEF Globalist fer some reason.... I thought it was more've an indie "con"...
So IF the man's a WEFfer AND a "boner"-fide prevert, wull, I ain't gonna clutch my Budda Beads in shock (ain't gotta pair anywayz)... Any man'at wears an orange dress n' no panties might be a little off... or a LOT off...
I'm glad the little boy DIDN'T. I hope he DIDN'T later. eeeew.
Childhood is precious and magical (in the lovely sense, NOT in magik, etc) but I disagree with one small thing ya said Karen:
"The concept that childhood is an innocent time and children should be protected from certain adult information and actions is rather a recent one. "
It's not so very recent... I know that the marketing of childhood became a big thing starting in the late victorian era...but keeping children safe and protecting them is as old as we humans are! All the fairy tales where it was a woe to them that didn't love their kids (the step-moms like in Hansel & Gretel). SO many stories are about dear parents SO wanting children (Peach Boy! Tom Thumb / Thumbelina!)... So it's always been a joy to have children an' a blessing. I think it's just that hardships (kids havin' ta work) conflicted at times with parents natural an' genuine desire to let children be children...
An' when that happened (Dickens....) there WAS much hand-wringin' too. Havin' the stability (nay luxury) of letting children have full childhoods was first a perk of bein' rich but later...it was for everyone. And THAT (more recent ) development is of what'ya speak (I think). Sigh... back in the ol' 20th century when our parents had it "better" they could let kids be kids--even those've us who didn't grow up with the proverbial silver spoon... cuz we Americans could "do it!"... Even some've us more financially "limited" folks did our best to let our kiddos to have their full an' innocent an' joy-filled childhoods. (An' ding it, if the dang plandemonium hadn't come BOTH of my dear girls would'a been able to have their teen years no stolen away--cuz they have been.... another story entirely)
Anyway, sadly no longer (apart from Plandemics Inc) are parents able to enjoy what the 20th c afforded children--THAT era has been dismantled both economically AND ideologically (just as ya say so well here...) And that is a true tragedy.... As another lovely Karen (Carpenter!) sang, Bless the Beasts AND the Children! (oh an' talk about social pressures messin' up a young talent....an' yet she sang like an angel!)
Having suffered from advances unwarranted by both minister & scoutmaster, that left a youngling mind of 8-12 shocked and running, to know why.
I discovered why and from this awareness sought reasonably to stand perfect as all-fathers godson fearfully and wonderfully made good, for living in service of honor for honor above all else. For honor, at least honor for honor founded upon Nature's Law & Nature's (Creator/Creative) Science of Right Reason, allows by divine providence good will settlement of conflicts of interest to support and maintain a peaceful universal public order.
So, simply put to any call, never answer less than honor for honor in service above all else, eternally forevermore. Do this, fellowship in Council of honor and your eternal perfection is at hand.
I appreciate your comment and here is my response. First, I wouldn't describe what I wrote as "lashing out". As I mentioned, this old man happens to be the most revered spiritual leader in the world (besides the pope). If he cannot control his actions towards children in public, he should be removed from any contact with children, both in public and in private.
As I said, what is at least equally disturbing is the indulgent laughter of those around him. And then, I go into the blatant lies that are told to cover-up of his actions--meant to protect him, not the victim. This happens to victims all the time. They are gaslit. They are made to feel small and insignificant. Did it really even happen? You are exaggerating. Don't make such a big fuss.
His "Holiness" did not apologize for his actions, he apologized for his words. This is an extremely important distinction that I make. It cannot be overstated.
"To whom much is given, much is required". This is a straightforward matter. His actions were clear. But we are somehow supposed to no longer acknowledge reality and if we do, we are the dangerous ones.
My comment refers to a kind of tendency to lash out. I am simply not certain of what an old man from another culture meant by this act. i will reserve my opinion until or unless I know for certain. By way of explanation - see attached article.
Lashing out refers to the firestorm of public sentiment on this event. This is one of many posts and many mainstream media stories on this event.
By "knowing for certain" I certainly don't mean it was not entirely cringeworthy - I just cannot say in indicates some kind of child abuse. This face kissing or tongue sucking or whatever strange event may be explainable in another way by another culture. I don't think his actions were "clear' at all.
I guess in the days of Joe Biden and Jeffrey Epstein and the willful "transgender" mutilation of children through surgery and drugs it seems an overkill reaction.
That said the Tibetans and the Dalai Lama have put themselves in this position. They benefited financially from the largesse of the press and public sentiment. Maybe it is Karma.
If this isn't clear, I don't know what is. He doesn't ask, he says with authority: And suck my tongue. And everyone laughs. You can do the research, there is no such tradition, and even if there was, it isn't just inappropriate, it is perverse. I don't know if you have children, but I cannot imagine this happening to my child from his father, uncle, grandfather, priest, monk, doctor, psychiatrist, let alone the Dalai Lama. You can also research sexual abuse of children by monks in Temples. As we see in any religious institution where certain people are put on a pedestal, there is a culture of fear, secrecy and impunity that protects them. I explained why I wrote about it, and how I have been hesitant to address other shocking videos. I didn't feel I could ignore this. Again, I very carefully go into the lies that covered up the actions, making it about words, literally as if what he actually DID never happened. Lies, nothing less than lies, and yet that seems to be of no importance. And that's precisely why it is important because it illustrates how powerful figures are the ones protected and not the victims. Anyway, I guess if you don't see it, there's nothing more to be said, and perhaps I've gone on too long. I understand not everyone will agree.
As a grandmother and mother of six. I am deeply disturbed by child abuse of any sort and write regularly about it. Thanks for your responses but we have a failure of communication. It happens. I understand what you are saying but I obviously haven’t explained well enough. Guess I will need an essay on this subject as well.
I find it incredible that people try to water this down, justify his actions, turn a blind eye. But this happens all the time with victims. Yes, we need to speak out.
Wow--so well said once again, Karen. I've been reading several of those articles & watching some of those videos in the last few days, & the mamma bear in me was getting very angry! What are they doing to our kids?!?! Thank you for speaking TRUTH in a world full of perversions & lies--unashamedly!!
There's a video of Putin kissing a little boy's stomach in front of an admiring crowd. George W. Bush kissed children in an icky way. That's elite culture.
Yes, it is.
Thank you for this outstanding article. You put into words what I feel in my heart.
the swimming pool at the vanderbilt mansion
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f6/af/f1/f6aff1de8bcb09d57ece76de42b6d0cb.jpg
tony podesta's art collection
https://preview.redd.it/vcl47aytjfb51.jpg?auto=webp&s=83701ef22afcb56fd5eda835c9e89c897039f415
this is de rigeur in the club of rome/council on foreign relations world
Horrible
Outstanding job Karen- exposing the evil! I am truly at loss for words- only tears
Thank you Karen for this.
And some extra insight from Mathew Crawford - the Dali Lama was paid by the CIA to come to the USA! Trained and paid for years....
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v30/d337
"The Dalai Lama's Traveling Road Show"
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-dalai-lamas-traveling-road-show?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2FDali%2520Lama&utm_medium=reader2
Yes, there's so much more to be said on this.
"The purpose of life is to be happy" is a lot like the iconic Aleister Crowley saying "Do what thy wilt is the whole of the law". They are in effect the same thing. It means everything is about you and nothing else matters.
Good point.
speechless.
Muslim countries have wonderful solutions for all of this.
Yes, except that a lot of terrible things go on there as well, behind closed doors--and out in the open.
All these pieces of s***t mentaly deranged and pedophiles creatures, ( I can't call them humans), are organized very well in a web of famous clubs, organizations, forums etc, dalai lama is of club of rome. They never have been and never will be punished, they take care and cover each other better than we take care of all children. Such a sick world...
This is so disturbing on so many levels. Surely no one can believe this will end well.
2 yrs ago when I saw that David Martin included the "Dolly Llama" on the shortlist of globalists ta watch our for my eyes got big! I KNEW that there was somethin' kinda scam-ish about his celebrity tours... I knew the old connections in general to MI6/Tavistock... datin' back to the 1960s, an' about all that Hollyweird fete'in' an' all them fundraisers by the Thurmans (Uma & her daddy) an' all the fancy buildin's in New Yawk fer these folks... (I wondered even back then if Richard Gere's devotion was sincere an' he wuz just hornswoggled...or if he knew stuff... I thought the former as he seems to have stepped away from the dark side o' hollyweird...) So all that was already on my radar, but I did not think of Hello Dolly as a WEF Globalist fer some reason.... I thought it was more've an indie "con"...
So IF the man's a WEFfer AND a "boner"-fide prevert, wull, I ain't gonna clutch my Budda Beads in shock (ain't gotta pair anywayz)... Any man'at wears an orange dress n' no panties might be a little off... or a LOT off...
I'm glad the little boy DIDN'T. I hope he DIDN'T later. eeeew.
Childhood is precious and magical (in the lovely sense, NOT in magik, etc) but I disagree with one small thing ya said Karen:
"The concept that childhood is an innocent time and children should be protected from certain adult information and actions is rather a recent one. "
It's not so very recent... I know that the marketing of childhood became a big thing starting in the late victorian era...but keeping children safe and protecting them is as old as we humans are! All the fairy tales where it was a woe to them that didn't love their kids (the step-moms like in Hansel & Gretel). SO many stories are about dear parents SO wanting children (Peach Boy! Tom Thumb / Thumbelina!)... So it's always been a joy to have children an' a blessing. I think it's just that hardships (kids havin' ta work) conflicted at times with parents natural an' genuine desire to let children be children...
An' when that happened (Dickens....) there WAS much hand-wringin' too. Havin' the stability (nay luxury) of letting children have full childhoods was first a perk of bein' rich but later...it was for everyone. And THAT (more recent ) development is of what'ya speak (I think). Sigh... back in the ol' 20th century when our parents had it "better" they could let kids be kids--even those've us who didn't grow up with the proverbial silver spoon... cuz we Americans could "do it!"... Even some've us more financially "limited" folks did our best to let our kiddos to have their full an' innocent an' joy-filled childhoods. (An' ding it, if the dang plandemonium hadn't come BOTH of my dear girls would'a been able to have their teen years no stolen away--cuz they have been.... another story entirely)
Anyway, sadly no longer (apart from Plandemics Inc) are parents able to enjoy what the 20th c afforded children--THAT era has been dismantled both economically AND ideologically (just as ya say so well here...) And that is a true tragedy.... As another lovely Karen (Carpenter!) sang, Bless the Beasts AND the Children! (oh an' talk about social pressures messin' up a young talent....an' yet she sang like an angel!)
This is absolutely appalling. He is no longer holy, in any way. The mirage has evaporated. And those who laughed along, they are equally vile.
Having suffered from advances unwarranted by both minister & scoutmaster, that left a youngling mind of 8-12 shocked and running, to know why.
I discovered why and from this awareness sought reasonably to stand perfect as all-fathers godson fearfully and wonderfully made good, for living in service of honor for honor above all else. For honor, at least honor for honor founded upon Nature's Law & Nature's (Creator/Creative) Science of Right Reason, allows by divine providence good will settlement of conflicts of interest to support and maintain a peaceful universal public order.
So, simply put to any call, never answer less than honor for honor in service above all else, eternally forevermore. Do this, fellowship in Council of honor and your eternal perfection is at hand.
Be wise, safe and blessed,
Arthur
You must be sure of what you’re saying to make such a charge. Are you?
I appreciate your comment and here is my response. First, I wouldn't describe what I wrote as "lashing out". As I mentioned, this old man happens to be the most revered spiritual leader in the world (besides the pope). If he cannot control his actions towards children in public, he should be removed from any contact with children, both in public and in private.
As I said, what is at least equally disturbing is the indulgent laughter of those around him. And then, I go into the blatant lies that are told to cover-up of his actions--meant to protect him, not the victim. This happens to victims all the time. They are gaslit. They are made to feel small and insignificant. Did it really even happen? You are exaggerating. Don't make such a big fuss.
His "Holiness" did not apologize for his actions, he apologized for his words. This is an extremely important distinction that I make. It cannot be overstated.
"To whom much is given, much is required". This is a straightforward matter. His actions were clear. But we are somehow supposed to no longer acknowledge reality and if we do, we are the dangerous ones.
My comment refers to a kind of tendency to lash out. I am simply not certain of what an old man from another culture meant by this act. i will reserve my opinion until or unless I know for certain. By way of explanation - see attached article.
https://open.substack.com/pub/kwnorton/p/transgender-philosophies-weaponized?r=boqs0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Lashing out refers to the firestorm of public sentiment on this event. This is one of many posts and many mainstream media stories on this event.
By "knowing for certain" I certainly don't mean it was not entirely cringeworthy - I just cannot say in indicates some kind of child abuse. This face kissing or tongue sucking or whatever strange event may be explainable in another way by another culture. I don't think his actions were "clear' at all.
I guess in the days of Joe Biden and Jeffrey Epstein and the willful "transgender" mutilation of children through surgery and drugs it seems an overkill reaction.
That said the Tibetans and the Dalai Lama have put themselves in this position. They benefited financially from the largesse of the press and public sentiment. Maybe it is Karma.
If this isn't clear, I don't know what is. He doesn't ask, he says with authority: And suck my tongue. And everyone laughs. You can do the research, there is no such tradition, and even if there was, it isn't just inappropriate, it is perverse. I don't know if you have children, but I cannot imagine this happening to my child from his father, uncle, grandfather, priest, monk, doctor, psychiatrist, let alone the Dalai Lama. You can also research sexual abuse of children by monks in Temples. As we see in any religious institution where certain people are put on a pedestal, there is a culture of fear, secrecy and impunity that protects them. I explained why I wrote about it, and how I have been hesitant to address other shocking videos. I didn't feel I could ignore this. Again, I very carefully go into the lies that covered up the actions, making it about words, literally as if what he actually DID never happened. Lies, nothing less than lies, and yet that seems to be of no importance. And that's precisely why it is important because it illustrates how powerful figures are the ones protected and not the victims. Anyway, I guess if you don't see it, there's nothing more to be said, and perhaps I've gone on too long. I understand not everyone will agree.
As a grandmother and mother of six. I am deeply disturbed by child abuse of any sort and write regularly about it. Thanks for your responses but we have a failure of communication. It happens. I understand what you are saying but I obviously haven’t explained well enough. Guess I will need an essay on this subject as well.
Please do! Thanks for the conversation. I know we are both on the same page with all of this.
I find it incredible that people try to water this down, justify his actions, turn a blind eye. But this happens all the time with victims. Yes, we need to speak out.