78 Comments

President Trump OBVIOUSLY needs to hire his own security team. He can no longer rely on the Secret Service.

P R O T E C T T R U M P❕️

Expand full comment

ASAP!

Expand full comment

Kennedy, too. Or maybe the security they both need could be paid for by the Secret Service, but hired by the candidates. Such agencies should be neutral and work equally for all. Bobby can't even get protection!

Expand full comment

Absolutely. Kennedy has been denied protection--but after this, maybe it's a good thing he hasn't had it.

Expand full comment

yup... with "friends like that..." -- but Bobby Jr should have a strong security detail (private)... anyone that speaks out is at risk now...

ps that "fantasy" list of how ta kill DJT is frightenin'!

Expand full comment

Yes, because, as we've just witnessed, it would give a false sense of security!

Expand full comment

Isn't Secret Service protection reserved for official candidates? If Trump wasn't a former President, I don't believe he would have it either until after the convention. Hilary and Biden also had it initially due to being former First Lady and VP as opposed to being candidates. Please correct me if I'm wrong here but that is my impression. It's questionable whether RFKJ will even be able to get on the ballot in enough states to possibly win the election. And if we were to give protection to him, it would also have been due for every candidate in both primaries-all 20 of them the last 2 elections-as well as every independent candidate. Can you imagine Kanye West with a Secret Service detail? And can you imagine anyone in Congress being willing to vote for that kind of expenditure right now?

Expand full comment

The reason I mentioned it is because protection is given under certain conditions. Given the fact Kennedy's father and uncles were both assassinated, there might be a reason for him to receive it. "Secret Service protection has been extended to candidates for president — and not just presidents themselves — since a law was enacted in 1968, following the assassination of Kennedy’s father during his presidential campaign."

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meetthepressblog/government-decides-presidential-candidates-get-secret-service-rcna96926

Expand full comment

No, not when they still seem to require BILLIONS of dollars more for Ukraine.

Expand full comment

Regardless of the current budget though... The fact remains that RFK is no more entitled to protection under current legislation than you or I. There has to be some sort of line between who is and who is not given federal protection, particularly these days when it seems that unknown people come out of the woodwork to enter primaries or run as independent or third-party candidates. I don't know about you, but I really don't want my tax dollars going toward protecting Kanye West, running under "the Birthday Party" and too ill and erratic to even file the papers to get on the ballot in most states.

Protecting all the family members of former Presidents is difficult enough. Taxpayers had to pay several million dollars per year for at least two years because, after Trump left office, Ivanka didn't want the agents sworn to take a bullet for her to use one of her 6 bathrooms, so they had to rent a studio nearby in their exclusive neighborhood so the agents could relieve themselves. I'm sure there have been other such abuses of the unlimited budget for protection. We need more oversight there, not less.

Expand full comment

Lmao

Expand full comment

Melania’s statement is incredible. Today is so surreal.

Expand full comment

Yes. She's amazing. She's Slovenian. Slovenia is my second home. My daughter is half Slovenian.

Expand full comment

No kidding another Russian apologist. Sorry, Slovenian. Just like trumps First Tramp 🤣

Expand full comment

This person trashes the entire country of Slovenia and all its people and then blocks me 😵‍💫

Expand full comment

Troll. Ignore. Move along little airhead.

Marvelous piece, Karen. Liking, saving and restacking, sharing.

Blessings.

Expand full comment

🙏

Expand full comment

Did you see bidementedjoe's video post shooting? He called President Trump, Donald, twice. The new definition of insincerity. 🤘😎🤘

Expand full comment

Yeah, that's right LOL

Expand full comment

I think the Biden Regime wanted to be disrespectful. Sofen the blow for their voters, who think Trump hitler deserved it. Therefore it wasn't really an attempted assassination of a former president and the likely future Pres. Nope It was, to quote, CNN 'shots fired at a Trump rally'

I swear, that level of disrespect simply says the only problem was that it was attempted and not successful.

Democrats, are literal psychopaths.

Expand full comment

And what a blathering hypocrite Biden is, calling for Trump to tone down the rhetoric and have a "civil" campaign after the relentless hatemongering ire focused by Biden's entire party and the media toward Trump for the past several years!

Expand full comment

Not sure I follow-last I checked, that IS his name. Should he have said Mr Trump? Mr Former President? Mr Presumed GOP Candidate? Holy Deity? I mean, Trump is the king of snarky nicknames and calls Biden-who is the current President-"Sleepy Joe" or "Crooked Joe" but never President Biden. So I'm not sure how you are so certain that using Trump's given name is "insincere" unless you are the only human in the world who can read minds?

He said repeatedly that this is wrong and can't happen, and that the rally should have been able to go forward "with no problems". I have no way of knowing how sincere that was, and neither do you. But, at least he said it.

Expand full comment

All former presidents are normally referred to as "President" and then their last name. And CERTAINLY not referred to in the media by just their first names!

Expand full comment

Love him or hate him - Trump was right about Iraq.

Expand full comment

He sure was

Expand full comment

Well written! Thanks for a great article

Expand full comment

You're welcome!

Expand full comment

This is the beginning of what is most likely going to be a very tumultuous time especially in the big cities leading up to and after the election, it was a miracle that he wasn't killed yesterday and even people who don't believe in God are saying that... Lord Jesus lead on!! Maranatha!!

Expand full comment

Powerful, informative & well written article - thank you much. Our Creator lives in the Truth & the Light of Truth will come to pass. Grateful to all the Truth Warriors who continue to speak Truth to tyranny. I believe in the Power of Prayer & right action - prayers for our Nation - GOD Bless America ...

Expand full comment

Amen

Expand full comment

Per Attorney Bobbie Ann Cox CNN reported that "Trump Fell"--yup, (jawdrop) like "Biden" so as ta do a quid pro quo on the senility / fragility angle AND make those on their schmart phones that just read the ledes see only that "the old man fell"--NOT that he did NOT fall but was told ta DROP to the ground so he didn't git his brains blown out...

https://attorneycox.substack.com/p/shots-fired-america-burning?

I just heard Tore Maras (listenin' to her now) say that DJT's private security stunk--she said Mike Lindell had hired the same firm for his event thinkin' that if they were good enuf fer The Donald they'd be good but Tore said they were IN-suck-curity, not really there to protect him. So mebbe they were in cahoots with--which part've the swamp? CIA? I dunno but neither the SS (secret service mebbe should be called the "SS") nor the private suck-curity seems to have done their parts--is everyone on the take to take out the guy? I feel like it's 3 card Monty... all rigged too

Expand full comment

Yeah, I heard about the "he fell" narrative lol. Definitely a wake up call to up.tue security. Thank goodness.

Expand full comment

The most important thing is reality, right now.

And the first question is:

# 1. Who gets to vote in the: general election?

a. citizens only - Yes No

b. natural born citizens only - Yes No

c. natural born citizens with four natural born grandparents - Yes No

d. naturalized citizens (legal immigrants) - Yes No

e. legal immigrants not yet naturalized - Yes No

f. anyone with a drivers license – Yes - No

# 2.1 Ages of Voter

g. minimum18 years

h. minimum 21 years

i. minimum 25 years

j. minimum 30 years

k. minimum 33 years

# 2.2 Sex of Voter

a. Male – Yes - No

b. Female – Yes - No

c. Non – Binanry - Yes - No

d. Transgender - Yes - No

# 2.3 Competence of Voter

e. property owners net value over $50,000 - Yes - No

f. property owners net value over $250,000 - Yes - No

g. have paid a minimum of $5000 per year of tax combined jurisdictions (school district, county, city, state, federal) in excess of any SS, medicare, medicaid, ATFWDC received - Yes - No

h. those receiving welfare / food stamps – Yes - No

i. tax exempt persons – Yes - No

j. those with unpaid child support obligations - Yes - No

k. those receiving WIC – Yes - No

l. those receiving Section 8 – Yes - No

m. those working for government bureaucracies – Yes - No

# 2.4 Genetic presence of Voter

a. Male without children – Yes - No

b. Male with children – Yes - No

c. Male with children plural vote – Yes - No

d. Female without children – Yes - No

e. Female with children – Yes - No

f. Female with children plural vote – Yes - No

g. Only married males with children, never divorced can vote. – Yes - No

# 3.0 Who should be trusted with the responsibility and power of Public Office?

a. Only those authorized to vote - Yes No

b. Male without children – Yes - No

c. Male with children – Yes - No

d. Male with children plural vote – Yes - No

e. Female without children – Yes - No

f. Female with children – Yes - No

g. Female with children plural vote – Yes - No

h. Only married males with children, never divorced can hold public office – Yes - No

i. Depends on the office - Yes - No

Expand full comment

Excellent roundup.

Expand full comment

If he really is a modern day Adolf Hitler and truly a threat to our Democracy as we've been told over and over, shouldn't they (the Democrats, the mainstream media) be applauding the effort, but lamenting that he missed (like many of their deranged followers are doing on social media)?

Which is it?

I'm confused?

I hope they can clear that up for me soon, so I know what I'm supposed to think.

They probably won't though bc doublethink is very important to the Party

Expand full comment

Comparing Trump to Hitler is not all bad. Trump brought back the America I knew in just four years; Hitler brought back Germany from the spoils of WWI and the Versailles Treaty in 5 years.

Expand full comment

here's one of the fellas that WARNED the secret service 'bout the roof sniper (which did jack all ta help) https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/150850-2/

I think mebbe there were a few there--there's a LOT of argument about WHO the shooter was--I think at least 3 have been put forward--one is named "Crooks" -- were they all hired by the CIA? I dunno--everything 'bout this is "sus" as my girls say...

Appreciate the old clips--an' his APLOMB--his cool under "unfriendly fire" (Bush fire! very flammable stuff)

I HOPE ta god he's got serious protection for the entire fambly--not just Melania & Baron but all've 'em... the swamp tends ta cast a wide net...

Expand full comment

This will be discussed for a VERY long time and all the influencers will come forward with some special knowledge that they've just found out, etc., etc. 😵‍💫

Expand full comment

okay, Tore Maras (who strongly supports The Donald) agrees: multiple shooters--she has no "theory" but thinks the guy on the roof they "shot" was a distraction from the wrong angle...she also thinks there may have been one that hit his bullet proof vest and he went "down" for that reason too--tryin' ta review the footage in slo-mo, she sez the one that "got 'im" came from the back at close range and she noticed--I found this creepy--that on the right on every broadcast of the event they put some kinda "ad" in the frame blockin' it partially until AFTER the shootin' was done--which means there's something they don't want "us" citizen journalists scrutinizing.

YES there will be "influencers" comin' forward--I don't think ANYONE will have the real scoop tho'--I'm sad ta say--this is just the beginnin'--there will be more (Tore sez they'll git Biden too or make an attempt so "Biden" doesn't have to appear in public again) Me? I dunno but I fear there will be no election whatever goes down--also they'll limit the stumpin' etc. which puts a damper on voters...

Expand full comment

Thanks for the video.......I will send it to several people who will appreciate it.

Expand full comment

right on, gotta share the good stuff! (an' just saw ya subscribed--many a thanks yer way!)

Expand full comment

Manchurian candidate??? Or lousy shot CIA, SS, FBI agent.

Expand full comment

as Karen said this'll be discussed for a very long time! I started out thinkin' there was a real shot on The Donald--came ta change my mind fwiw--truly, I dunno but no matter what it's worrisome!

take 1 https://thcsofdaisymoses.substack.com/p/ass-ass-a-nation

take 2 https://thcsofdaisymoses.substack.com/p/ass-ass-a-nation-take-2

I think the CIA might'a "created" the patsy "Crooks" (MK Ultra'd / Manchurian style) but any real shots (in the audience) were not from the kid--more like from a real marksman... no way that kid could shoot "as required"

Expand full comment

I have never understood adoration or vitriol towards a person who you will never meet and really don't know except through the eyes of others. Most often the opinions of politicians and media are a handful of lies and half truths meant to appeal to their base. I encourage everyone to remain dispassionately cool headed and thoughtful. We can't afford to fan the flames of insanity run amok.

Expand full comment

VERY WELL SAID!!!

Expand full comment

You are right on!!!

Expand full comment