"If aggression against our country is launched from the side of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, we will immediately respond with everything we have," Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko
The lunatic fringe and their minions in the halls of power in the West have their own agenda. We make the mistake of expecting them to act according to our beliefs. They never do. Are they planning the destruction of the USA in a world war with Russia and China? Crazy, right?
But then again, before you can build back better, you have to tear it all down.
Catch Tucker Carlson’s interview with Colonel Douglas MacGregor. He has some very pertinent thoughts on who is best equipped to win a war with Russia…and it ain’t us! MacGregor knows his stuff when it comes to military, both at home and abroad.
Also: keep an eye on Serbia. Naturally pro-Russian, allied closely with China, a staging area for Middle Eastern migration into Hungary, and waiting for a chance to regain Kosovo.
How many know that a presidential directive signed by Clinton PDD-60 is still on the books, which would necessitate that the US absorb a nuclear strike? Provoking Russia in this regard makes sense. Let them strike us, then the elites come out of their bunkers blaming Russia once again, and uniting everyone under a NWO stating that "we can never let this happen again.":
Eisenhower, the last American general to win his war, when president, had “Massive Retaliation” as his foreign & defense policy, articulated at CFR in Jan, 1954: attack us or our allies and we will retaliate massively. Nukes. He disliked the idea of useless, expensive, drawn-out wars of attrition, and the ridiculous costs of maintaining huge conventional forces. Belarus simply is repeating Ike’s policy.
Ike got North Korea to Panmunjom by back-channeling to Mao that he’d nuke Pyongyang if they refused negotiating. Ike being a known quantity to Mao, the NORKs negotiated. Had we nuked Hanoi in 1963, it is likely we’d have saved over a million Vietnamese lives (we killed 2M), and all 75K American lives. And saddam likely would have listened to us, precluding that stupid invasion.
These drawn-out conventional wars of attrition always cost more - blood and treasure - than simply nuking the enemy. Nuking Japan saved - 1M American, and between 6-8M Japanese - lives, depending on whether you use the estimates from the Navy or the Army.
The lunatic fringe and their minions in the halls of power in the West have their own agenda. We make the mistake of expecting them to act according to our beliefs. They never do. Are they planning the destruction of the USA in a world war with Russia and China? Crazy, right?
But then again, before you can build back better, you have to tear it all down.
Catch Tucker Carlson’s interview with Colonel Douglas MacGregor. He has some very pertinent thoughts on who is best equipped to win a war with Russia…and it ain’t us! MacGregor knows his stuff when it comes to military, both at home and abroad.
Also: keep an eye on Serbia. Naturally pro-Russian, allied closely with China, a staging area for Middle Eastern migration into Hungary, and waiting for a chance to regain Kosovo.
Why would the globalists nuke the planet?
Why wouldn't they get the UN to broker peace talks to prevent this?
Perhaps, because this war is designed to linger on and on and on.
Meanwhile, the wagner guy who tried to do a coup was in St Petersburg and the donbass leader that criticized the war is locked up in Russia...
How many know that a presidential directive signed by Clinton PDD-60 is still on the books, which would necessitate that the US absorb a nuclear strike? Provoking Russia in this regard makes sense. Let them strike us, then the elites come out of their bunkers blaming Russia once again, and uniting everyone under a NWO stating that "we can never let this happen again.":
http://tobefree.press/2023/05/29/skousen-wwiii-pdd-60-update-russians-and-chinese-dont-believe-the-us-will-absorb-a-nuclear-first-strike-why-they-still-think-they-can-win-even-if-the-us-does-launch-on-wa/
Eisenhower, the last American general to win his war, when president, had “Massive Retaliation” as his foreign & defense policy, articulated at CFR in Jan, 1954: attack us or our allies and we will retaliate massively. Nukes. He disliked the idea of useless, expensive, drawn-out wars of attrition, and the ridiculous costs of maintaining huge conventional forces. Belarus simply is repeating Ike’s policy.
Ike got North Korea to Panmunjom by back-channeling to Mao that he’d nuke Pyongyang if they refused negotiating. Ike being a known quantity to Mao, the NORKs negotiated. Had we nuked Hanoi in 1963, it is likely we’d have saved over a million Vietnamese lives (we killed 2M), and all 75K American lives. And saddam likely would have listened to us, precluding that stupid invasion.
These drawn-out conventional wars of attrition always cost more - blood and treasure - than simply nuking the enemy. Nuking Japan saved - 1M American, and between 6-8M Japanese - lives, depending on whether you use the estimates from the Navy or the Army.
Prigozhin is in Africa now doing what he loves to do best--make money.
https://open.substack.com/pub/roloslavskiy/p/wagner-update-all-quiet-on-the-belarussian?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b71t5