The Weaponization of Drugs and Disease
Anti-immunity Vaccines, Drugs in Space, Disease X, and Sudiksha Thirumalesh, the brave teenager who fought for the right to live.
One-time or recurring donations can now be made at Ko-Fi
You can listen to me read this essay here:
Sudiksha Thirumalesh
Before we get into the latest drugs and disease horrors that the totalitarian world regime has in store for us, I want to shout out the name “Sudiksha” and I would ask that you do that same.
Sudiksha Thirumalesh, 19, suffered from a rare mitochondrial disorder. She died of a heart attack last week after fighting the NHS for the right to go to the United States for experimental treatment, a right that was denied to her. Instead, the court determined that she should be moved to end-of-life palliative care.
Despite two court appointed psychiatrists stating that Sudiksha had the capacity to make her own decisions, the courts ruled in favor of the doctors who argued that her refusal to accept their view of hopelessness was a sign of delusion.
During the legal battle, a gag order was placed on her family. She was simply referred to as “ST”. Now that she is dead, her name can finally be said, and her story known.
Below is her brother’s impassioned speech:
“We did not look for this fight. This fight came to us from a system that gives up too readily on life. We were brutally silenced, intimidated and taken to court in the hour of our need. It is shocking that a family in the middle of stress and tragedy had a threat of imprisonment hanging over their heads.”
“To those who seemed only to care about Sudiksha dying, we forgive you. We are a Christian family who believe in life, love and forgiveness.”
Stories like this remind us that we, as ordinary citizens, are only as good to the state as what they can get out of us. We are not much different than rats in a lab to be drugged and experimented on. When we reach the end of our usefulness, we are left to die. Never forget the horrors of Covid, when the elderly died in isolation and were not even allowed a decent burial.
While ordinary people suffered, the elites partied.
Memories of California governor Gavin Newsom dining at three Michelin-star restaurant French Laundry while the plebs were in lockdown comes to mind. A restaurant that received over $2.4 Million in PPP COVID Loans.
There’s something seriously wrong with all of this and yet, the madness just keeps on getting worse.
While Gavin Newsom dined maskless with his friends, ordinary grandchildren had to visit their grandparents like this:
Indeed, the filthy rich didn’t seem to be very scared of Covid. I wonder how many of them really did take the vaccine. I would bet my last dollar that Bill Gates didn’t. And I am absolutely sure he didn’t subject his children to it.
These “cures” are meant for the rest of us. And these cures are becoming more and more sinister.
Anti-immunity Inverse Vaccines
If you need proof, look no further than “Inverse Vaccines”. This is a new and exciting way to combat disease, by taking away your natural immunity instead of beefing it up.
An MIT article explains what these vaccines are:
We tend to think of our immune system as a beefy bodyguard, fighting off pathogens that seek to harm us. But it has another, equally important job. “Mostly our immune system ignores stuff that it’s being exposed to all the time,” says Megan Levings at the BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute in Vancouver (and a member of Anokion’s scientific advisory board). That includes “all the food we eat, all the bacteria that live on our bodies, all the funguses and mold in the environment.”
The capacity to ignore—known as immune tolerance—isn’t passive. The immune system learns which things are dangerous and which are not, and stores that memory in specialized cells. When the system makes a mistake and flags a harmless protein as dangerous, the mixup can cause serious problems—allergies, autoimmune diseases, and other types of immune disorders.
With traditional vaccines, the goal is to deliver a foreign substance in a way that raises alarms. That’s why vaccines are often combined with ingredients called adjuvants, which provoke a stronger immune response. (mRNA vaccines don’t need adjuvants because the immune system already sees genetic material as a threat.) With inverse vaccines, also called tolerogenic vaccines because they provoke tolerance, the goal is to train the immune system to recognize that a particular target is harmless.
What could possibly go wrong with trying to train a body to “recognize a particular target as harmless” What if the body gets confused and picks the wrong target? Or what if it forgets how to pick targets because it has come to rely on outside interference to do the job for it?
The Inverse of Immunity is not without its flaws.
“Any student taking 'immunology 101' will tell you that wiping out a large part of the immune system will lead to opportunistic infections,” says Lawrence Steinman of Stanford University School of Medicine in California.
Steinman is one of a small number of immunologists working to tackle autoimmunity in a more targeted fashion through vaccines. However, these 'vaccines' are not prophylactic shots against disease; rather, they act as therapeutic treatments. And, unlike most conventional vaccines, which typically stimulate the immune system to react against foreign pathogens, Steinman and his colleagues hope to reduce the response of an overactive immune system to the body's own triggers while leaving the rest of the system intact. “If we can throw the 'on' switch, shouldn't we be able to throw the 'off' switch?” asks Steinman.
The thought of mistakes happening keeps Steinman up at night, but not enough to make him stop. Not when the payoff could be so big.
“It’s a field where a lot of people want to make the breakthrough and become the next chapter in the glorious history of vaccination,” Steinman says.
Now Steinman serves as chairman for a company called Pasithea Therapeutics, and he’s working on a new inverse DNA vaccine for multiple sclerosis.
mRNA vaccines. Inverse vaccines. And now DNA vaccines? The World Health Organization describes DNA vaccines like this:
The field of DNA vaccination is developing rapidly. Vaccines currently being developed use not only DNA, but also include adjuncts that assist DNA to enter cells, target it towards specific cells, or that may act as adjuvants in stimulating or directing the immune response. Ultimately, the distinction between a sophisticated DNA vaccine and a simple viral vector may not be clear. Many aspects of the immune response generated by DNA vaccines are not understood. However, this has not impeded significant progress towards the use of this type of vaccine in humans, and clinical trials have begun.
How many times do we have to hear this kind of crap before we stop taking their poisons?
“May not be clear.”
“Are not understood.”
But, hey, it “shows promise in mice… or monkeys…or pigs.”
Could there ever be a more ludicrous statement than referring to this plethora of vaccines as “the next chapter in the glorious history of vaccines.”
There is nothing glorious about it, not when millions of parents dutifully subjected their children to experimental mRNA “vaccines”.
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published a disturbing paper, which looked at 887,193 children aged five to 11 in North Carolina, 30.8 percent (273,157) of whom received at least one dose of Pfizer's mRNA (messenger RNA) shot between Nov. 1, 2021, and June 3, 2022.
…scientists determined that the shots fail rather quickly post-injection and eventually eat away at immunity in a manner similar to AIDS – hence why many now refer to post-injection immune degradation as vaccine-induced AIDS, or VAIDS.
The shots not only failed to provide protection for the children after just a few short months, but they also left the children in worse immune shape overall.
Are we living in a nightmare from which we cannot wake up? Apparently so. The drug pushers just keep on producing these drugs, with no sign of stopping, and what do you think they will do with them all, even if they prove useless? They aren’t going to just throw them away. What will they do with all those drug factories I wrote about in Building the mRNA Empire. They plan to vaccinate the world, slowly but surely destroying humanity’s natural immunity, replacing it with their drugs so that everyone becomes totally dependent on their next fix.
Remember that more than 5.55 billion people worldwide have received a dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, equal to about 72.3 percent of the world population. More than 2.72 billion additional doses have been administered worldwide.
There seems to be no thought for long-term consequences about anything anymore. The experts have developed a disturbingly myopic view where they focus on a growing mountain of diseases, fantasizing that they can cure each one with a drug—all with hefty price tags which the already overburdened taxpayer is supposed to finance. Nobody got the Covid shot for free. The government paid the drug companies billions of taxpayers’ money so they could turn around and inject everyone they could get their hands on, subject them to humiliating faulty PCR tests, not to prove anyone was sick, but to condition people to submissively give up their data when ordered to.
These scientists and doctors—the “experts”, and their overlords, are incapable of understanding that we are part of a complex and delicately balanced world. I suspect this is because they reject the concept of consequences. They are far too important for that. There is no higher power to whom they are answerable. There is no such thing as divine omniscience. God is dead. There are now a bunch of little gods running around, maniacally tinkering with the natural order of the universe—because they are so rich that they can. When a new disaster arises, thanks to their tinkering, instead of pausing to think that maybe they are on the wrong track, they rub their hands together in glee at the thought of coming up with yet another “solution”, which then causes another problem and so on down the line.
Do they really think they can target one part of an overactive immune system while “leaving the rest of the system intact?” How much worse can all of this get? How much more damage are they capable of doing before we all cough our last breath in their quest to keep us barely alive so they can continue their Frankensteinian experiments on us for their twisted pleasure. These experts are evil, but not half as evil as the higher powers they answer to; those who reap billions of dollars from our illnesses and subsequent “cures”.
I wrote about this topic in my essay, To Live Forever. Time magazine has now come out with an article about Bryan Johnson, The Man Who Thinks He Can Live Forever.
Johnson is so full of himself he calls his personal quest for immortality “the most significant revolution in the history of Homo sapiens.”
That quest includes “downing 111 pills every day, wearing a baseball cap that shoots red light into his scalp, collecting his own stool samples, and sleeping with a tiny jet pack attached to his penis to monitor his nighttime erections. Johnson thinks of any act that accelerates aging—like eating a cookie, or getting less than eight hours of sleep—as an ‘act of violence.’”
Drugs in Space
Drugs are the answer for everything. There can never be enough drugs. So much so that Space X is now launching satellites to research and develop drugs in space.
Forget space tourism. Varda Space wants to make drug manufacturing the next big extraterrestrial business. Why? Because there’s big bucks in drugs.
Profit is the number one driver of any venture. If the space economy is to become a $1 trillion sector by 2040, as one Citigroup report suggested, tried and true drug production will be a big part of it.
California-based startup, Varda Space Industries, is betting that big business will lie in relatively unassuming satellites that will spend days or months in Earth’s orbit quietly carrying out pharmaceutical development. Its research, company officials hope, could lead to better, more effective drugs — and hefty profits.
Eventually, the firm hopes that research will yield a golden ticket drug, one that proves to be better when manufactured in space and can return royalties to Varda for years to come.
Just imagine all the dangerous experiments that could be performed “perfectly safely” because it would be in space! Drug Factories in Space!
“In space, microgravity lets materials grow without encountering walls, and it allows them to mix evenly and hold together without traditional supports.”
And they can grow bigger and faster. That’s the American way, right? Bigger and faster. But wait a minute. We already have enough problems with dangerous pathogens being released from labs here on earth. What makes us think the same thing, or worse, won’t happen in space.
In fact, TechCrunch reported that on September 15th the “U.S. Air Force denied a recent request from Varda Space Industries to land its capsule at a Utah training area,” due to safety concerns.
Varda originally planned to bring back a capsule containing crystals of ritonavir, a drug used to treat HIV, in mid-July.
The company declined to comment but posted on X that the “spacecraft is healthy across all systems” and that they are continuing to collaborate with regulators to bring the capsule back to Earth.
What a relief to know that the “spacecraft is healthy”. How desperately we need it to fight all the terrible diseases we already have and the new ones they are discovering, seemingly on a daily basis.
Just to stay safe, in case they have missed one, the WHO has a list of diseases that includes Disease X.
Experts warn about Disease X
The World Health Organization keeps a short list of “priority diseases” that could cause the next deadly pandemic.
Most of the diseases are already known to us — Ebola, SARS and Zika made the cut — but the final entry has the terrifying name “Disease X.”
The term Disease X is used by the WHO as a placeholder to describe a disease that’s unknown to medical science as a cause of human infections.
And as a new disease agent — whether it’s a virus, a bacterium, a fungus or other agent — there likely won’t be any vaccines or few, if any, treatments available.
“This isn’t the stuff of science fiction,” Dr. Richard Hatchett, of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, told the Telegraph. “This is a scenario we have to prepare for. This is Disease X.”
You see how this works? They have a placeholder for a disease, and they can make it anything they want.
Have they found a cure for AIDS? Have they found a cure for COVID? Have they found a cure for diabetes? Have they found a cure for cancer? Have they found a cure for heart disease?
No.
Why do these companies keep manufacturing drugs that don’t do much of anything? The complex answer is transhumanism.
The cost of cancer drugs now represents between 50% and 60% of the total cancer spend and continues to climb. Prices for new drugs approved for the treatment of cancer more than doubled between 2009 to 2019, from an average monthly cost of $6,000 to nearly $15,000.
Andrew Hertler, M.D., chief medical officer at New Century Health, a specialty care management company, notes that most of these new, high-priced therapies do not cure cancer — and, on average, have a limited effect on survival. According to Hertler, 71 consecutive FDA approvals of drugs to treat solid tumors increased survival an average of just 2.1 months, and 70% of the drugs approved over the past two decades had no effect on improving overall survival.
“What we’re trying to do with the mRNA vaccine for cancer is alert the immune system to the tumor so the immune system will attack it—it’s basically biological software,” explains John Cooke, a physician and medical director of the Center for RNA Therapeutics at Houston Methodist.
No, Cooke, what you’re actually doing is destroying our body’s natural immune system, one vaccine at a time. And we are paying for the pleasure. 85% of basic cancer research is funded through taxpayers’ money, according to the American Association for Cancer Research, yet on top of that, we are expected to bleed more money the sicker we get from all the toxins in drugs, food, the clothes we wear, the air we breathe.
It’s all out of hand. Completely. Out. Of. Hand. But don’t worry!
Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan announced they're building a computing system to help eliminate human disease by 2100.
Eliminate disease? Wow. And I guess we are supposed to believe them.
This lovely couple aims to develop a computing system that researchers can use with AI to catalog cells and predict how they act when diseased. The data could be used to make new discoveries that completely cure human disease, Chan and Zuckerberg said in a statement.
No, no, well, not quite, says Chan. It won’t actually eliminate disease. It will just make it less severe—oh, sort of like those Covid shots.
The bill for this system will be astronomical—what a surprise! Just like with all their new-fangled clean energy lies, the energy used by such a system will be enormously polluting. This means that you must sacrifice your lifestyle so that theirs does not change. You will need to live an ever more oppressed existence so that the elites can build their machines and gather their data and cause further destruction of humanity along the way. The amount of data needed for their machines will need to be extracted from someone—and that someone will be ordinary citizens. In order to achieve their mad goals, everyone will need to be herded into 15-minute cities, and monitored 24/7, perhaps even hooked up to Neuralink or something similar, inside their brains.
Why do you think Bryan Johnson is all over the news now? To condition people to think that having everything from their poop to their sexual habits monitored should be perfectly normal and all for the good of their “health and safety”.
Like Sudiksha, no one will have the right to live if they decide you should die. No one will have the right to decide they want natural immunity rather than drugs. No one will have the right to refuse drugs if the state determines it is “good for you”.
Drugs and disease go hand in hand, feeding off of each other and growing stronger while our immune systems grow weaker. And these little gods running around like chickens with their heads cut off, want us to buy into the lie that they have the answers, even as they admit that they really don’t understand how any of their supposed cures work. Nor can they promise that they even are cures.
It would be funny if it weren’t so dangerously true.
So, once again, let’s all say the name Sudeksha, who fought for the right to live, and that right was taken away. She speaks for us all. The state wants to take away our rights to our own lives. To our own health. To make our own decisions about anything. Let’s remember that any one of us could be Sudeksha.
Are we living in a nightmare from which we cannot wake up? Well, life does feel rather like living in a nightmare. I can't wake up from it -- I've tried, even back when the nightmare wasn't quite so terrible -- but that doesn't mean that there isn't any way out.
So much depends upon our assumptions and beliefs. You can think of beliefs as "hardened" assumptions. When an assumption hardens into a belief, there is no longer any need to examine it. It becomes de facto truth, without the need for evidence.
That, however, is not the only way belief can work. It is how beliefs often work when adopted unconsciously, often under influence. Another way a belief can function is as a "placeholder". When evidence is lacking, you can consciously adopt a belief as a temporary placeholder, working with it as if it were true but remembering that it is not demonstrated to be true.
This use of beliefs is related to the scientific method and testable hypotheses, though perhaps not quite as formal, and not as restrictive as to where it may be applied. Placeholder beliefs, however, do need to be testable, and the mental discipline that supports adopting them must also support replacing or discarding them if they are eventually falsified.
We live in a world where a great many people have been influenced to adopt false beliefs about what we are, how we came to be, and what is expected of us. These beliefs have hardened to concrete, and many people are trapped within their belief systems, unable to see through them to what really is.
A hardened belief acts as a filter against what we can see and understand. You could also say it acts as "blinders". When a hardened belief is at odds with reality, reality loses and the belief wins. If the result doesn't make sense, we call it paradox and go on.
Underlying hardened beliefs are self-reliance, and belief in the self as being right. Those can be hard things to let go of. But it is possible. One might be "in recovery" for a long time afterward, but there is a way out for some.
I can't say what that would be for every individual. For me, it began long ago when I was part of a corrupt religious cult that changed one of the rules. I happened to observe that my own view of reality seemed to shift when I adopted that change. I saw things differently. But I also noticed that neither the former truth nor the "new truth" was necessarily true! It didn't matter if the belief was true or not. Either way, it would act as a filter, potentially to my detriment.
My recovery time? About 57 years. 25 years into it I learned that the reason for the earlier change was that the founder of the cult was determined to do something that had been strictly forbidden by the cult (marry someone that was divorced), and so he invented a "new truth", that it was OK now. This, in a cult where couples were required to split up in the case of remarriage if they were to join the cult. I am grateful that he did this. I learned something extremely valuable from it about beliefs, and I was soon able to walk away from the cult.
Finally coming to know actual truth should set a person free. I know of only one such truth, the gospel of salvation through Jesus Christ. Many will disagree. I spent decades avoiding it and exploring others. But people can put "their truth" to this test. Does it actually set them free?
This is what is so awful about legalizing euthanasia. It will never stay voluntary. Any more than it did in Nazi Germany, and we all saw how it worked out there, where it ended up. You just can't put a lid on It, or control it any more than you can control a wild fire. It is sin, evil,there are just some things that you just ought not to mess around with and this is one of them! It leads to genocide and the widespread devaluation of life.