Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jay's avatar

Very well written, as usual. I am all for the taking of Greenland in any way but with military force. I don't think Trump intends military force where Greenland is concerned, but I do believe he will use his usual powerful rhetoric and perhaps other devices to grease the wheels, so to speak. That's an important stronghold for us in opposition to China, whose dominance over the world would certainly be worse than that of America's.

As for Canada, Mexico, Panama Canal, I think that is mostly rhetoric used in order to make a deal, we'll see. It has already worked in getting Justin Trudeau to step aside and once Pierre gets in control, Canada actually has a chance again. If Trump actually pursues some of these other ideas more forcefully, I will be the first to say that's not what I voted for. I'm not on the record on Substack but I'm on the record in my personal life among my family and friends as having a very big issue with Elon Musk being made essentially part of the government. Just like you, I was concerned about this a long time ago. I was glad at least to see that he was not given an actual cabinet position but all the same, it seems an odd choice if for no other reason than the fact that the optics are not in Trump's favor.

I can see why the liberal media is pushing this idea that Elon is really in charge because honestly, what other conclusion would you draw? It's a little strange that Trump is suddenly unconcerned about people around him speaking about his agenda on his behalf or just generally hogging the spotlight. He is typically more conservative about who he allows into his orbit and how brightly they shine—I'm wondering if Elon Musk is becoming a problem that's tricky for him to solve, seeing that you don't want somebody like Elon as an enemy, but he probably shouldn't have made him such a good friend. Perhaps difficult to ignore considering how much Elon did to get him elected, so it's complex, no doubt.

This all feels a bit like bait and switch, and so one of two things is happening: it's a bait and switch and Trump was thinking about this stuff all along but just didn't talk about it during the campaign, or Elon Musk really is the problem that some of us suspect he might be. My vote is the latter, sadly. I say sadly because it would require me to accept that Trump has given up his usual position as truly the guy with the upper hand.

I hope it is mostly rhetoric, especially with respect to Canada and Mexico (no offense to either nation but I wouldn't want them as states, very much for the reasons you mentioned) nor do they have any interest in that. It's not as though these people have some tough economic times and suddenly lose their own nationalistic pride. We certainly haven't and wouldn't. And if all of this is rhetorical in order to strike deals that are more profitable for us and more stabilizing for the world, I'm all for it. And even though I lean as I described above, I also tend to think rhetoric is mostly what this is, even if influenced by people like Elon Musk.

That said, nothing would make me happier than to see Musk's orbit slowly degraded until he just falls back to Texas and lets the country get on with its business.

Expand full comment
Alan's avatar

I keep wondering who Trump is pandering to when he discusses Greenland and the Panama Canal. The average American could not even locate them on a map much less care whatsoever.

Expand full comment
59 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?